PLAYER DEVELOPMENT

Individual players.
Individual next steps.

Explore selected coaching reports and the dated evaluations available in the public archive.

DOCUMENTED FOLLOW-UP

From feedback to follow-through.

12Youth players in the project
7Players with baseline → retest comparisons
6Mechanical categories tracked per player
Baseline → Retest 1 · Six-category mechanical scores
PlayerBaselineRetest 1Change /60Session datesSource report
Leo*34/6038/60+42026-08-12 → 2026-09-26Read comparison ↗
Austin*34/6038/60+42026-08-12 → 2026-09-26Read comparison ↗
Justin*35/6038/60+32026-08-12 → 2026-09-26Read comparison ↗
Alex*35/6040/60+52026-08-15 → 2026-09-27Read comparison ↗
Aaron34/6037/60+32026-09-19 → 2026-09-26Read comparison ↗
Max*36/6039/60+32026-06-21 → 2026-09-26Read comparison ↗
Swen*28/6033/60+52026-08-05 → 2026-09-27Read comparison ↗

* Earlier baselines for six players were retrospectively mapped to the current rubric in their retest reports; Aaron’s baseline already used it. Each category is scored out of 10, total out of 60. These are video-based coaching assessments, separate from CQS contact quality. The records describe this group’s observed changes; they do not establish a guaranteed training effect.

Explore six-category changes and session videos ↓

The complete project includes 12 youth players. Seven have paired baseline and Retest 1 reviews; their comparisons appear below. Vincent’s self-analysis is separate. Report files include translations and summaries, so file totals are not participant counts.

Compare evaluations ↓

PROGRESS OVER TIME

Compare evaluations.

Choose one of the seven retested players to compare all six mechanical categories. Open the source report and dated videos to follow the coaching cycle. CQS contact-quality scores are kept separate.

FAMILY PERSPECTIVES

Progress beyond the numbers.

Read parent feedback or share your experience.

Parent Feedback